VMware retiring VMI
VMware has decided to retire VMI support:
http://blogs.vmware.com/guestosguide/2009/09/vmi-retirement.html
Their thinking behind this is that CPU virtualization technologies are overtaking any potential performance benefits from paravirtualised guests. (This announcement doesn’t refer to the paravirtualised drivers they have been introducing.)
VMI will be phased out of Workstation first; beginning in 2010; followed by vSphere in 2011.
Obviously they feel the effort in maintaining this capability isn’t worth it. I get the impression that VMware introduced VMI primarily to compete with Xen. I don’t think that VMware was ever that convinced that it was a good way to virtualize VMs.
2 Responses to VMware retiring VMI
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Forbes Guthrie
Recent Posts
- vSphere 5 vReference Card released
- Cisco UCS boot from iSCSI SAN – ESXi design consideration
- vSphere 5 vReference card – Storage section
- Does 2008 R2 Failover Clustering require a change to the Notify Switches policy?
- vSphere 5 vReference card – Host section
- vSphere 5 vReference card – Install section
- Auto Deploy design concern
- vSphere 5 vReference card – vCenter section
- vSphere 5 vReference card – VM section
- vSphere 5 vReference card – availability section
Recent Comments
- free antivirus software download on Firewall port connection diagram
- Tim Sommer on vSphere 5 Card
- vJohnnyF on vSphere 5 Card
- Forbes Guthrie on Cisco UCS boot from iSCSI SAN – ESXi design consideration
- Chris on Cisco UCS boot from iSCSI SAN – ESXi design consideration
- Forbes Guthrie on vSphere 5 Card
- Forbes Guthrie on vSphere 5 Card
- harold on Auto Deploy design concern
- MarcelVanOs on vSphere 5 Card
- Forbes Guthrie on VMworld 2012 dates and location
Twitter
- Eek! This is big >> RT @DuncanYB: New Article: No Jumbo frames on your Management Network - http://t.co/VjoCtOqz : 2 weeks ago
- RT @ryanbirk: @forbesguthrie ...owe you a beer! Read all 50 pgs of your notes and passed the VCI-5 exam this morning << Congrats, great news : 2 weeks ago
- Working with Host Profiles today. Clunky, but a great tool. : 2 weeks ago
- @csilvertooth Frustrating yeah, they maybe need a popup warning message check when you start it without correct permissions. #VMware : 2 weeks ago
- RT @joshcoen: Passed VCP5 this morning. Big shout out to @jaslanger and @forbesguthrie #invaluableresources. << Congrats! : 2 weeks ago
- RT @cwjking: @forbesguthrie Someone commented on my blog to link to your site for VCP5 related stuff. http://t.co/7KqZsNuv << thx : 2 weeks ago
- @sanchezhutz Nice, I hear lots of good things about those. David is nice chap. : 3 weeks ago
- .RT @cxi: I'll be in Vancouver the week of the 23rd ;) << Great. Anyone else in Vancouver up for vBeers? I'm free 23,25,27 /cc @astorrs : 3 weeks ago
- @sanchezhutz Best of luck Sanchez! When are you planning to take it mate, work paying for it? : 3 weeks ago
- New blog post: vSphere 5 vReference Card released - http://t.co/4rYEPsM9 : 3 weeks ago






I use VMI guests only for NTP servers, no matter what I cannot get NTP to sync up in a fully virtualized guest. Though in a VMI guest it works fine. Wonder what the solution to running an NTP server will be if VMI goes away. Not interested in running a physical box to sync my VM hosts to that just has NTP, and not interested in having them sync directly to the internet(in many cases the hosts don’t have internet access).
Hi Nate,
What is the guest OS you are using for your NTP servers? Do you have VMware tools installed in the guest?
I just wonder what sort of problems you are experiencing, just that they lose a little bit of time or does it vary wildly? Does the ESX host keep its time properly? Is the host synced to another NTP source?
Anyway, if you want an internal based NTP source, but don’t want to use a physical server, why not use one of your core switches or something like your firewall. That’s a pretty common way to have a centralized time source for all your servers.