Dear VMworld (part 2)
Dear VMworld,
Well you sent you me a nice email today, to tell me you had added sessions, for the lab you had overbooked. The email informed me that overbooked users would be given priority to ensure that those users would be accommodated. So I logged into my session builder and selected the date and time that was suitable (Tue 7:30 am). However the system wouldn’t allow me to change the session time, as I was already on the waiting list for original session. So I remove myself from the original session. Now when I try to select the replacement session, it tells me it’s also full and there is no waiting list. The session builder won’t even allow me back onto the waiting list for the original one.
So much for providing priority places. Just how many people were double booked?
Well, I’m now in an even worse position than I was this morning. Unfortunately, all these emails come from a do_not_reply address, so I can’t even contact VMware. Anyone facing the same thing (again)?
Update:
I was contacted (2nd comment below) by Margaret Pfeiffer. Margaret works in VMware’s “Marketing Communications” (presumably a synonym for the PR department).
She was able to make this statement:
“We definitely had an issue with all instances of LAB 04. It was identified in the schedule builder with the wrong occupancy for the room, which was not uncovered until it had been fully subscribed. (Purely human error.) Once we realized we had an issue, we tried to move the lab into a larger room. However, due to the technology demands to run this lab, it wasn’t possible to move it. So, we were left with the unfortunate choice of having to bump people from the labs. Admittedly, we didn’t do a very good job communicating this to attendees BEFORE it happened. But, with the addition of seats in the back of the room, and the additional labs, we are hoping that we are accommodating most, if not all, the folks who were affected by our error.”
This is obviously related to a particular lab class, however it didn’t explain the numerous other bumps and drops that some people experienced.
On the Friday evening, VMware contacted several people who missed out in LAB04 problems and offered them a free Boot Camp which was being run on the Sunday. I doubt that many people would be able take advantage of this offer, at such short notice, and things didn’t seem to go so well.
Issues like this are always going to happen at such large events. However its how organisations react to them which speaks volumes. To VMware’s credit they did put on additional classes for some events and tried to “reach out” after the problems. I’m here at VMworld now, so have high hopes for the week.
2 Responses to Dear VMworld (part 2)
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Forbes Guthrie
Recent Posts
- Small update to the Reference Card
- Minor update to the vSphere 5 Reference Card
- vSphere 5 vReference Card released
- Cisco UCS boot from iSCSI SAN – ESXi design consideration
- vSphere 5 vReference card – Storage section
- Does 2008 R2 Failover Clustering require a change to the Notify Switches policy?
- vSphere 5 vReference card – Host section
- vSphere 5 vReference card – Install section
- Auto Deploy design concern
- vSphere 5 vReference card – vCenter section
Recent Comments
- honglus on How to PXE boot from your trunked vmnic0
- Sunmeet on Understanding ESXi – stateless, diskless, feckless
- Forbes Guthrie on vSphere 5 Card
- Forbes Guthrie on vSphere 5 Card
- Jakk on vSphere 5 Card
- Purushothama S on vSphere 5 notes
- Bjorn on vSphere 5 Card
- Chris on Minor update to the vSphere 5 Reference Card
- Michael Webster on Auto Deploy design concern
- Ankur Maheshwari on vSphere 5 notes
Twitter
- As much as I've become an NFS supporter over the years, VMFS5 & ATS is really making me like iSCSI & its better multipathing. : 2 weeks ago
- @__wintertale__ Hi Iona (& Lesley). Welcome to the twitterverse from a cloudy and wet Vancouver. How's the coffee? : 3 weeks ago
- RT @jtroyer: ... Kaua'i http://t.co/s4Ovo4jD << Staying in same resort next month. Pls, no destroying it with wild parties ;) : 3 weeks ago
- RT @dobaer: @forbesguthrie How was the run in your shiny new shoes? << Nice, the trails around Vancouver are stunning. : 3 weeks ago
- @h0bbel I'm a Salomon addict, but I'm scared to get these ones muddy :) : 3 weeks ago
- Just took my pwutty new #salomon trail shoes for an hour's run in Pacific Spirit Park. http://t.co/7dAQDXgl : 3 weeks ago
- RT @alim__k: @forbesguthrie @keith_aasen look at you guys, figuring this out over social media ;-) < that's where I do all my best designs : 3 weeks ago
- @keith_aasen Great, just what I was after. And presumably one per controller to prevent performance degradation on failover (after refill) : 3 weeks ago
- @keith_aasen You're the VDI sizing TR author :) You're my Guru! : 3 weeks ago
- NetApp gurus: VDI on 3170 - where's FlashCache watershed for 2x 512GB to 4. When is it 2TB not 1TB? Don't say "it depends" /cc @keith_aasen : 3 weeks ago






Well, at least you got an email!
I logged in today to check my schedule as saw that one of the sessions I registered for (and hour after registration opened) was now marked as having me on standby.
I called the 800 number and was instructed to send an email with explanation to:
VMworld2009Registration@jackmorton.com
I promptly got back what appears to be a form letter saying how sorry they were for the confusion and how they will take it up with VMware….. but go ahead and schedule something else in that timeslot.
I’ve seen FREE events with less bugs that this one I paid two grand to attend. The site is abysmal, the timing of the promised tools is abysmal, and apparently their ability to build a schedule is also abysmal.
Good luck, but I doubt you’ll get any satisfaction….
Forbes and Don,
Please contact me directly, I would be happy to look into the issues you have experienced and try to resolve them.
Thanks
Margaret Pfeiffer
mpfeiffer@vmware.com