VMworld: VMFS3
On Wednesday I attended the VMFS3 session entitled “VMware vStorage VMFS-3: Architectural Advances since ESX 3.0″. It was a very interesting little session discussing some of the under-the-covers work through the evolution of VMFS3.
However, why am I blogging about it now? Well one thing jumped out at me during the presentation. The speaker (I think it was Satyam Vaghani), introduced a slide which showed the testing that they were doing on the next implementation of VMFS3 (3.45). To be honest I can’t remember the exact detail of the slide (and unfortunately the uploaded version currently on the VMworld site doesn’t have the same slide), but what I do recall is the upper limits of the testing. The slide was showing the effects of new locking mechanisms. It showed the performance of 8 hosts connecting to 512 VM on 1 VMFS LUN! Holy smoke. Ka-Pow. Imagine being able to do that.
What sort of effect would that have on your datastore provisioning? Time to re-think your VDI solution? I can’t wait
3 Responses to VMworld: VMFS3
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Forbes Guthrie
Recent Posts
- Small update to the Reference Card
- Minor update to the vSphere 5 Reference Card
- vSphere 5 vReference Card released
- Cisco UCS boot from iSCSI SAN – ESXi design consideration
- vSphere 5 vReference card – Storage section
- Does 2008 R2 Failover Clustering require a change to the Notify Switches policy?
- vSphere 5 vReference card – Host section
- vSphere 5 vReference card – Install section
- Auto Deploy design concern
- vSphere 5 vReference card – vCenter section
Recent Comments
- honglus on How to PXE boot from your trunked vmnic0
- Sunmeet on Understanding ESXi – stateless, diskless, feckless
- Forbes Guthrie on vSphere 5 Card
- Forbes Guthrie on vSphere 5 Card
- Jakk on vSphere 5 Card
- Purushothama S on vSphere 5 notes
- Bjorn on vSphere 5 Card
- Chris on Minor update to the vSphere 5 Reference Card
- Michael Webster on Auto Deploy design concern
- Ankur Maheshwari on vSphere 5 notes
Twitter
- As much as I've become an NFS supporter over the years, VMFS5 & ATS is really making me like iSCSI & its better multipathing. : 2 weeks ago
- @__wintertale__ Hi Iona (& Lesley). Welcome to the twitterverse from a cloudy and wet Vancouver. How's the coffee? : 3 weeks ago
- RT @jtroyer: ... Kaua'i http://t.co/s4Ovo4jD << Staying in same resort next month. Pls, no destroying it with wild parties ;) : 3 weeks ago
- RT @dobaer: @forbesguthrie How was the run in your shiny new shoes? << Nice, the trails around Vancouver are stunning. : 3 weeks ago
- @h0bbel I'm a Salomon addict, but I'm scared to get these ones muddy :) : 3 weeks ago
- Just took my pwutty new #salomon trail shoes for an hour's run in Pacific Spirit Park. http://t.co/7dAQDXgl : 3 weeks ago
- RT @alim__k: @forbesguthrie @keith_aasen look at you guys, figuring this out over social media ;-) < that's where I do all my best designs : 3 weeks ago
- @keith_aasen Great, just what I was after. And presumably one per controller to prevent performance degradation on failover (after refill) : 3 weeks ago
- @keith_aasen You're the VDI sizing TR author :) You're my Guru! : 3 weeks ago
- NetApp gurus: VDI on 3170 - where's FlashCache watershed for 2x 512GB to 4. When is it 2TB not 1TB? Don't say "it depends" /cc @keith_aasen : 3 weeks ago






You got it! BTW, we stopped at 8 hosts because we ran out of storage hardware (I believe we were consuming a little over 3 TB at that point). Oh, and I’d like to point out that the new locking mechanisms will work on existing VMFS volume too, so you can squeeze out more from your existing setups.
Thanks Satyam, I really enjoyed the session.
VMFS 3.x scales a lot better than a lot of people think… I need to see this presentation online as soon as it’s available!